4.0 Beta Performance Test

[valtam]

Linux Lite 4.0 Beta Performance Test on real hardware after a fresh install.

This OS is flying, can't wait for the Final!

No sound.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m-aynCFVvOE

[Artim]

It looks like it's installed on a 50-core Supercomputer with 5000 terrabyes of RAM!

[valtam]

It looks like it's installed on a 50-core Supercomputer with 5000 terrabyes of RAM!

Lol. Specs are on YouTube

[newtusmaximus]

Jerry, are you saying speed/response on like for like computer has improved over LL 3.8 64bit - With what RAM & CPU?

[Scott(0)]

[size=1em][member=149]newtusmaximus[/member][/size]

[size=1em]With what RAM & CPU?[/size]

Here's the YouTube video link

Code:

youtu.be/m-aynCFVvOE

the system specs are below the video but I'm listing them here as well:

Processor: Intel® Core™ i3-4160 CPU @ 3.60GHz
[size=1em]Memory: 8073MB (611MB used)[/size]
[size=1em]Resolution: 1920x1080 pixels[/size]
[size=1em]Video: 4th Generation Core Processor Family Integrated Graphics Controller[/size]
[size=1em]SSD: OCZ-VERTEX 60Gb[/size]

[TheDead]

Wowza!

I wonder how much of this speed is due to the SSD. :-O
Also, is this video made just after a reboot / bleachbit cleaned config?
Don't want the cache/swap misleading this performance... or use of steroids.

Cheers!

[valtam]

The test pc is a mix of old and new hardware. A modest, dual core cpu, a 1st gen - 7 year old SSD.

[newtusmaximus]

But 16 GB RAM is the clincher surely?

[justme2]

But 16 GB RAM is the clincher surely?

Does it actually make any difference? LL3.8 never seems to use anywhere near one-eighth that amount of RAM. Maybe I'm missing something?? Having said that, my Lenevo with 8GB RAM is very nippy, but so is my eeePC901 with 1GB RAM.

[valtam]

Well said [member=296]justme2[/member] Can't we just focus on the fact that we didn't get any fatter. Surely the glass is half full here?